Framing Charge under Sections 3/4 PMLA: Why Role Attribution Must Be Transaction-Specific — Person, Process, Proceeds of Crime & Accused-Specific Nexus

Framing charge under Sections 3/4 PMLA requires more than describing a business group, family, company network or set of transactions as collectively involved in money laundering. Section 3 is structured around the person, the process or activity and the product—proceeds of crime. Therefore, a rigorous charge-stage analysis should break the prosecution theory into date, property, account, amount, transaction, counterparty and accused, and then identify whether the particular person is alleged to have concealed, possessed, acquired, used, projected or claimed the proceeds of crime, or attempted

{ "@context":"https://schema.org", "@type":"BlogPosting", "headline":"Framing Charge under Sections 3/4 PMLA: Why Role Attribution Must Be Transaction-Specific — Person, Process, Proceeds of Crime & Accused-Specific Nexus", "description":"Comprehensive 2026 guide to framing charge under Sections 3/4 PMLA through date, asset, account, transaction, accused-sp…